dfmchn_

community perception risk map · texas · data centers

Data centers in Texas: what the neighbors say

Where opposition forms, what triggers it, what would defuse it, and how the talk about water compares with the water record.

september 24, 2026 · 36,411 public posts, comments and written testimony · 2023 to 2026

read this first

  • One honest caveat up front. This is what people say in public, sorted carefully. It is directional, not a poll. Most forum posts do not name a county, so the place comparison leans on where the forum is based and on the handful of sites people name. The water record covers surveyed facilities only; a site that has been announced but not yet surveyed shows up as silence, not as zero.

How we listened

We read 36,411 public posts, comments and written testimony about building data centers in Texas, written between 2023-01 to 2026-09: 15,896 from Texas city and state forums, 17,472 from national technology and AI forums, 1,497 from a forum for people who work in data centers, 1,099 from organized opposition groups, and 447 written comments to a Texas House committee. We sorted each one by what bothered or pleased the writer, where they stood, whether they said they had changed their mind, and what they did about it. Where someone quoted a number about water, we wrote the number down exactly as they said it and later compared it with the state's own water survey.

The water side comes from the Texas Water Development Board: the yearly water use of every county since 2000, and the monthly water intake that each surveyed industrial facility reports, which lets us pick out the data centers by name.

of 15,896 Texas forum posts are opposed

about 6 in 10

are open to it with conditions

roughly 1 in 24

describe taking action, not just posting

roughly 1 in 83

raise water as the main or second concern

roughly 1 in 5

Where opposition is loudest, and whether the water record agrees

The state water survey records 1.05 billion gallons drawn by 24 surveyed data-center facilities in 2024, which is about 3,217 acre-feet for the year. Set against everything else Texas uses, that is about 3.0 gallons of every 1,000 gallons that manufacturing draws (0.30 percent) and about 6.2 gallons of every 10,000 that towns and cities use (0.062 percent). The 2025 survey lists 88 facilities drawing 1.55 billion gallons, but most of that rise is more facilities being surveyed, not the same sites using more. These are self-reported figures from surveyed facilities. Sites that have been announced but are not yet in the survey, such as the Abilene campus, do not appear in the record at all.

Across the 22 counties with at least 30 posts, the rank link between how often people raise water and how much water data centers actually draw there is moderate (rank correlation -0.45, verdict: negative). Water worry without a water record: Nueces, Grimes, Bell, Hays, Grayson, Potter. Of these, Bell (temple) are announced sites the survey has not caught up with; the record is silent, not zero. Water record without much worry: Milam, Ellis, where surveyed facilities draw water but local posts rarely raise it.

0%27%54%80%107%10^4100 thousand1 million10 million100 million1 billionno recordrecorded data-center water intake in the county, gallons per year, latest survey year (log scale)share of posts about waterTaylorTravisTarrantBexarDallasWilliamsonHoodBastropNuecesCollinGraysonHarriscounty named in the postscounty assumed from the local forumsite announced, not yet surveyed
Circle size is the number of posts. Counties with fewer than 30 posts are listed in the table but not drawn. The water record is the self-reported intake of surveyed facilities; announced sites are not yet surveyed.
data table · where opposition is loudest, and whether the water record agrees
countypostsposts about watershare about watershare opposedshare taking actionrecorded gal/yrrecord yearsurveyed facilitiesannounced sites
BASTROP1091816.5%51.4%7.3%020250
BELL613862.3%83.6%73.8%020250meta:temple
BEXAR123539031.6%48.2%1.0%4,687,13520258microsoft:san_antonio
CALDWELL681725.0%50.0%4.4%020250
COLLIN731013.7%52.1%13.7%218,418,44620259
DALLAS98814614.8%42.1%1.3%287,578,497202522
EL PASO391846.2%48.7%2.6%111,00020251meta:el_paso
ELLIS431227.9%58.1%37.2%263,586,80020251google:red_oak;compass:red_oak
GRAYSON723041.7%83.3%93.1%020250
GRIMES422969.0%92.9%88.1%020250
GUADALUPE431432.6%55.8%14.0%020250
HARRIS721419.4%50.0%16.7%17,996,593202512
HAYS642945.3%59.4%14.1%020250
HOOD1191210.1%67.2%9.2%41,40020251
MCLENNAN572136.8%49.1%21.1%251,50020251
MEDINA491020.4%63.3%8.2%020250
NUECES1019493.1%75.2%1.0%020250
POTTER371437.8%45.9%8.1%020250
TARRANT135734525.4%58.9%6.0%68,374,19320253
TAYLOR202433716.7%43.8%0.7%020250stargate:abilene
TRAVIS189847825.2%53.0%2.1%71,423,89420258
WILLIAMSON53311822.1%63.2%5.3%020250
ANDERSON32insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
ANDREWS10insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
ANGELINA167insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
ARCHER10insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
AUSTIN10insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
BANDERA32insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
BLANCO11insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
BOSQUE21insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
BOWIE52insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
BRAZORIA73insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
BRAZOS62insufficientinsufficientinsufficient49,00020251
BROWN30insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
BURLESON21insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
BURNET32insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
CALLAHAN10insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
CAMERON102insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
CARSON167insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250fermi:amarillo
CASS40insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
CHEROKEE32insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
CHILDRESS30insufficientinsufficientinsufficient240,00020251
CLAY20insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
COMAL33insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
DELTA11insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
DENTON271insufficientinsufficientinsufficient101,864,01420256
ECTOR50insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
EDWARDS10insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
ERATH52insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
FANNIN2011insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
FAYETTE1614insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020251
FOARD20insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
FORT BEND52insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
GALVESTON41insufficientinsufficientinsufficient76,00020251
GARZA40insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
GILLESPIE10insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
GONZALES10insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
GREGG32insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
HALE10insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250
HALL73insufficientinsufficientinsufficient020250

73 more rows in the data file.

The ten counties people talk about most

countypostsshare about watershare opposedshare taking actionrecorded gallons, 2025surveyed facilitiesannounced sites
NUECES10193.1%75.2%1.0%00
GRIMES4269.0%92.9%88.1%00
BELL6162.3%83.6%73.8%00meta:temple
EL PASO3946.2%48.7%2.6%111,0001meta:el_paso
HAYS6445.3%59.4%14.1%00
GRAYSON7241.7%83.3%93.1%00
POTTER3737.8%45.9%8.1%00
MCLENNAN5736.8%49.1%21.1%251,5001
GUADALUPE4332.6%55.8%14.0%00
BEXAR123531.6%48.2%1.0%4,687,1358microsoft:san_antonio

What sets people off

In Texas forums the three concerns that most often start a complaint are local politics (roughly 1 in 6 of posts), water use (roughly 1 in 6 of posts), strain on the grid (roughly 1 in 6 of posts).

Texas local forumsnational forumsopposition groupsindustry peopleHouse testimonywater use16%41%17%25%39%strain on the grid16%17%5%13%13%farm and ranch land5%7%8%19%local politics17%4%13%4%dislike of AI itself6%11%13%5%electricity bills5%7%7%5%tax breaks5%7%4%jobs promised5%8%noise5%5%secrecy and code namesheat and climatediesel generators and airproperty valuescrypto mining5%traffic and construction
Each cell is the share of a source's posts whose main trigger is that concern. Brighter means a larger share.
data table · what sets people off
what set them offsourcepostsall posts from sourcesharemean intensity (1 to 10)share opposed
water_uselocal257415,89616.2%5.4859.6%
grid_strainlocal251315,89615.8%5.0547.2%
electricity_billslocal77715,8964.9%5.9174.1%
noiselocal52415,8963.3%5.2056.1%
air_diesellocal24215,8961.5%5.7765.7%
tax_abatementlocal86215,8965.4%5.7365.3%
jobs_claimlocal85615,8965.4%4.8236.4%
land_use_rurallocal77415,8964.9%5.2665.9%
secrecy_ndalocal15615,8961.0%5.6977.6%
ai_general_backlashlocal88615,8965.6%5.8769.0%
crypto_mining_associationlocal73915,8964.7%5.7770.5%
property_valueslocal24815,8961.6%5.5662.9%
local_politicslocal275115,89617.3%5.6769.9%
heat_climatelocal19415,8961.2%5.4362.9%
traffic_constructionlocal19915,8961.2%4.6144.7%
water_usenational714417,47240.9%5.3949.2%
grid_strainnational294317,47216.8%5.1446.5%
electricity_billsnational116817,4726.7%6.4076.2%
noisenational45317,4722.6%5.9463.6%
air_dieselnational49717,4722.8%5.8165.4%
tax_abatementnational60917,4723.5%5.7360.1%
jobs_claimnational31017,4721.8%5.4650.6%
land_use_ruralnational44817,4722.6%5.7367.4%
secrecy_ndanational11217,4720.6%6.3976.8%
ai_general_backlashnational187917,47210.8%6.3271.5%
crypto_mining_associationnational3017,4720.2%6.1073.3%
property_valuesnational4017,4720.2%6.2072.5%
local_politicsnational71117,4724.1%5.5862.5%
heat_climatenational61817,4723.5%5.3046.9%
traffic_constructionnational1517,4720.1%5.6753.3%
water_useindustry368149724.6%4.2718.5%
grid_strainindustry191149712.8%4.0516.2%
electricity_billsindustry9914976.6%5.4349.5%
noiseindustry7314974.9%4.7028.8%
air_dieselindustry2314971.5%530.4%
tax_abatementindustry10114976.8%4.7015.8%
jobs_claimindustry11914978.0%4.7716.0%
land_use_ruralindustry12614978.4%4.8737.3%
secrecy_ndaindustry3014972.0%5.9063.3%
ai_general_backlashindustry7114974.7%5.4940.8%
crypto_mining_associationindustry214970.1%5.5050.0%
property_valuesindustry3314972.2%5.3642.4%
local_politicsindustry6314974.2%4.7331.8%
heat_climateindustry2314971.5%4.0930.4%
traffic_constructionindustry1814971.2%4.4427.8%
water_useactivist192109917.5%4.9246.4%
grid_strainactivist5210994.7%4.0834.6%
electricity_billsactivist2910992.6%5.1048.3%
noiseactivist5010994.5%5.1256.0%
air_dieselactivist2710992.5%5.4166.7%
tax_abatementactivist2810992.5%5.1864.3%
jobs_claimactivist1310991.2%5.5461.5%
land_use_ruralactivist7610996.9%5.6671.0%
secrecy_ndaactivist4210993.8%5.6476.2%
ai_general_backlashactivist145109913.2%5.7070.3%
crypto_mining_associationactivist310990.3%566.7%
property_valuesactivist1410991.3%5.8664.3%
local_politicsactivist140109912.7%4.8950.7%
heat_climateactivist3310993.0%4.3345.5%
traffic_constructionactivist610990.5%6.1783.3%
water_usehearing17444738.9%7.5786.2%
grid_strainhearing5744712.8%7.0270.2%
electricity_billshearing214474.7%7.4890.5%
noisehearing144473.1%8.36100.0%
air_dieselhearing14470.2%8100.0%
tax_abatementhearing204474.5%7.0565.0%
jobs_claimhearing114472.5%6.9154.5%
land_use_ruralhearing8444718.8%7.5594.0%
secrecy_ndahearing104472.2%7.4080.0%
ai_general_backlashhearing164473.6%7.56100.0%
crypto_mining_associationhearing04470.0%
property_valueshearing64471.3%7.67100.0%
local_politicshearing104472.2%6.6040.0%
heat_climatehearing14470.2%7100.0%
traffic_constructionhearing14470.2%7100.0%

“Recall the entire Mayor and City Council. Their latest vote to approve 430 acres of land for a Data Center and ignoring opposition to it over concerns over environmental concerns”

local forum, Dallas-Fort Worth area

“Many interviews on the web state that they contaminated the water supply, and the price of electricity, taxes, and housing went up astronomically.”

local forum, Abilene area

The ladder from curious to taking action

Of everyone with a clear position, roughly 1 in 41 describe taking action against a data center, about 5 in 10 are concerned or opposed without acting, and roughly 1 in 8 accept or support one.

where people say they startedwhere they are nowunawareunawarecuriouscuriousinformed, undecidedinformed, undecidedaccepting with conditionsaccepting with conditionsconcernedconcernedopposedopposedtaking action againsttaking action againstsupportivesupportivetaking action fortaking action forresignedresignedunclearunclear
Only people who described a change of mind are drawn. Thickness is how many. Orange leads to taking action against, aqua to acceptance or support, green to other states; grey are the smaller flows.
data table · the ladder from curious to taking action
fromtopeoplemean intensitymain triggermain action
unawareconcerned575.83water_useposting_only
concernedmobilized_opposed527.31water_usecontacted_official
unawareopposed507.36water_useposting_only
unawarecurious393.13noneposting_only
curiousconcerned345.50water_useposting_only
unawaremobilized_opposed317.61secrecy_ndaattended_hearing
opposedmobilized_opposed277.41local_politicsattended_hearing
curiousinformed_neutral223.09water_useposting_only
conditional_acceptanceopposed207.10water_useposting_only
curiousopposed157.20ai_general_backlashposting_only
concernedopposed147.50water_useposting_only
supportiveopposed116.82ai_general_backlashposting_only
supportiveconcerned105.20grid_strainposting_only
concernedresigned106.30grid_strainposting_only
concernedinformed_neutral93.89noneposting_only
opposedresigned97water_useposting_only
informed_neutralconcerned95.11air_dieselposting_only
unawareinformed_neutral92.89noneposting_only
opposedconditional_acceptance74.86water_useposting_only
unawareresigned67.33secrecy_ndamoved_away
concernedconditional_acceptance54.60water_useposting_only
unawareconditional_acceptance54.40water_useposting_only
curioussupportive54.80grid_strainposting_only
informed_neutralopposed57.40water_useposting_only
conditional_acceptanceconcerned47.50water_useposting_only
concernedsupportive35.67crypto_mining_associationposting_only
mobilized_opposedresigned37.33air_dieselposting_only
opposedcurious24ai_general_backlashposting_only
curiousmobilized_opposed26local_politicsattended_hearing
concernedcurious24.50water_useposting_only
supportiveconditional_acceptance25ai_general_backlashposting_only
resignedopposed27.50ai_general_backlashposting_only
informed_neutralresigned26grid_strainposting_only
opposedconcerned23.50water_useposting_only
conditional_acceptanceresigned26.50land_use_ruralposting_only
mobilized_opposedopposed16local_politicsother
supportivemobilized_supportive18noneposting_only
supportiveresigned16grid_strainposting_only
curiousconditional_acceptance14ai_general_backlashposting_only
opposedinformed_neutral14crypto_mining_associationposting_only
opposedsupportive14tax_abatementposting_only
conditional_acceptancemobilized_opposed17water_usepetition
state_unclearsupportive18noneposting_only
supportivemobilized_opposed19water_useattended_hearing

Share who describe taking action, by source: Texas local forums roughly 1 in 83; national forums roughly 1 in 106; organized opposition forums roughly 1 in 15; public testimony to the House committee nearly all.

“The only good bitcoin farm is a burned down bitcoin farm. These scumbags are destroying the planet for private profit.”

local forum, Texas forum

“Our local government partnered with distant billionaires to destroy our town, our air, and our environment for to make number go up.”

local forum, Abilene area

Site-level risk table

Operators named in at least 20 posts, with how the posts lean and what the water survey records for their surveyed sites.

operatortypepostsshare opposedshare conditionalshare taking actionshare raising waterrecorded gallons, 2025surveyed sites
Stargate (OpenAI / Oracle / Crusoe)hyperscale86744.1%4.2%1.4%22.9%00
Amazon Web Serviceshyperscale61846.4%7.0%1.3%35.4%279,1181
Meta / Facebookhyperscale59046.1%5.1%1.7%39.5%65,215,9711
Googlehyperscale56844.9%5.5%0.9%52.6%263,586,8001
Microsofthyperscale49534.8%6.7%0.4%29.9%00
xAI (named, not in survey)unknown14753.7%6.8%0.0%27.9%00
Nvidia (named, not in survey)unknown7541.3%6.7%0.0%50.7%00
Riot Platformscrypto_hpc6755.2%3.0%0.0%1.5%131,204,1892
Anthropic (named, not in survey)unknown5851.7%5.2%0.0%13.8%00
SpaceX (named, not in survey)unknown5457.4%9.3%0.0%29.6%00
Tesla (named, not in survey)unknown5082.0%2.0%0.0%42.0%00
NTT Global Data Centerscolo4040.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%4,836,9001
Cloudburst (named, not in survey)unknown3948.7%2.6%12.8%35.9%00
CyrusOnecolo3638.9%5.6%2.8%16.7%106,943,1884
MARA (Marathon Digital)crypto_hpc3574.3%5.7%2.9%5.7%41,4001
Fermi America (Project Matador / HyperGrid)hyperscale2944.8%0.0%3.5%20.7%00
Elon Musk (named, not in survey)unknown2864.3%7.1%0.0%28.6%00
Stream Data Centerscolo2722.2%3.7%0.0%18.5%8,178,8832
Musk (named, not in survey)unknown2684.6%11.5%0.0%26.9%00
Vantage Data Centerscolo2548.0%0.0%12.0%16.0%00
QTScolo2420.8%4.2%0.0%79.2%76,692,3392
Palantir (named, not in survey)unknown2080.0%20.0%5.0%35.0%00
Chevron (named, not in survey)unknown2060.0%0.0%0.0%20.0%00

Announced sites not yet in the water survey

Google in Red Oak (Ellis County); Meta / Facebook in Temple (Bell County); Meta / Facebook in El Paso (El Paso County); Microsoft in San Antonio (Bexar County); Stargate (OpenAI / Oracle / Crusoe) in Abilene (Taylor County); Fermi America (Project Matador / HyperGrid) in Amarillo (Carson County); Vantage Data Centers in Albany (Shackelford County); Compass Datacenters in Red Oak (Ellis County).

What defuses opposition

2,414 people said they could accept a data center under conditions. The conditions they attach most often: water use (1288), strain on the grid (956), electricity bills (322), dislike of AI itself (238), heat and climate (214). Read plainly: they want the water question answered, the tax deal visible, and the grid bill not passed to them.

“Because of all this I’m having to consider relocating my family just so we don’t become homeless.”

local forum, Abilene area

“the answer to data centers all along has been - a well regulated environment on noise, water usage design and utility rate impacts protects normal people and allows business to proceed.”

local forum, Dallas-Fort Worth area

Early-warning signals

In Texas local forums, the share of posts raising water rose from roughly 1 in 17 to roughly 1 in 3 around 2025-03; this is a statistical break in the series, and the event behind it is confirmed by a person before it is named. In national forums, the share of posts raising water rose from roughly 1 in 3 to about 6 in 10 around 2025-05; this is a statistical break in the series, and the event behind it is confirmed by a person before it is named. Month by month, talk about water does not track the recorded rise in data-center intake; the two move independently.

0%29%57%86%115%0M81M162M2023202420252026share of each month's posts that raise water userecorded data-center water intake, million gallons per month, all surveyed facilities statewidesite announcedsite announcedlawsite announcedopposition forum openslawHouse hearingsite announcedopposition forum openssite announcedTexas local forumsnational forumsopposition groups
Months with fewer than 8 posts from a source are left blank. Dashed lines mark verified events only. Intake is the sum of monthly self-reported survey rows; the 2025 survey covers many more facilities than 2024, so the rise partly reflects coverage.
data table · early-warning signals
monthsourcepostsposts about watershare about waterall forum posts that monthrecorded intake, gallonsfacilities surveyed
2023-01local60insufficient9225,477,73810
2023-02local60insufficient8124,524,00010
2023-03local41insufficient38125,071,79010
2023-04local20insufficient18726,194,21210
2023-05local2400.0%15925,721,87910
2023-06local2400.0%27827,190,05210
2023-07local20insufficient15529,906,67510
2023-08local32412.5%22629,393,87610
2023-09local15021.3%32527,961,85810
2023-10local22313.6%22728,055,09410
2023-11local00insufficient15226,213,79710
2023-12local14810.7%45172,823,87710
2024-01local15521.3%43870,387,49124
2024-02local40271.7%76367,583,56824
2024-03local1317.7%12074,597,68524
2024-04local5500.0%20577,965,56224
2024-05local2214.5%50082,375,71424
2024-06local23420.9%47493,729,51924
2024-07local25920.8%56398,869,70024
2024-08local4337.0%172105,066,41724
2024-09local65812.3%19788,440,93324
2024-10local4012.5%28488,836,43324
2024-11local1292116.3%36578,617,18324
2024-12local5658.9%250121,780,09524
2025-01local2233314.8%44580,800,18888
2025-02local9888.2%32585,774,00788
2025-03local321134.4%601101,201,16288
2025-04local772026.0%300124,613,00988
2025-05local1394230.2%445123,280,05188
2025-06local972626.8%316140,839,57588
2025-07local34417751.5%1516154,657,36688
2025-08local1995829.1%485161,654,40388
2025-09local2308436.5%683158,926,34588
2025-10local3309629.1%564141,764,71688
2025-11local33812135.8%511117,128,85488
2025-12local57518732.5%972155,706,79188
2026-01local4077117.4%836
2026-02local97326527.2%1463
2026-03local78829737.7%1108
2026-04local122833327.1%1845
2026-05local113632728.8%1556
2026-06local199935217.6%3113
2026-07local193236719.0%2898
2026-08local257231912.4%3653
2023-01national20insufficient37225,477,73810
2023-02national10insufficient22524,524,00010
2023-03national11327.3%44925,071,79010
2023-04national13969.2%28526,194,21210
2023-05national8225.0%32525,721,87910
2023-06national21insufficient29027,190,05210
2023-07national1010100.0%21329,906,67510
2023-08national43insufficient39329,393,87610
2023-09national231565.2%23627,961,85810
2023-10national72insufficient31828,055,09410
2023-11national53insufficient28726,213,79710
2023-12national40insufficient34972,823,87710
2024-01national30insufficient23370,387,49124
2024-02national28414.3%60667,583,56824
2024-03national19526.3%39474,597,68524
2024-04national10110.0%32477,965,56224
2024-05national34823.5%49182,375,71424
2024-06national37924.3%54393,729,51924
2024-07national47510.6%51998,869,70024
2024-08national1300.0%798105,066,41724
2024-09national943436.2%75288,440,93324
2024-10national552240.0%52388,836,43324
2024-11national48714.6%49078,617,18324
2024-12national644062.5%489121,780,09524
2025-01national421023.8%116180,800,18888
2025-02national17317.6%48785,774,00788
2025-03national26726.9%574101,201,16288
2025-04national491938.8%578124,613,00988
2025-05national793848.1%843123,280,05188
2025-06national1619156.5%1181140,839,57588
2025-07national34123067.4%1680154,657,36688
2025-08national70446966.6%3470161,654,40388
2025-09national30213745.4%2000158,926,34588
2025-10national30519062.3%2923141,764,71688
2025-11national37919250.7%3400117,128,85488
2025-12national68542061.3%5518155,706,79188
2026-01national58934358.2%4034
2026-02national53037170.0%4337
2026-03national68640158.5%5636
2026-04national113540335.5%8098
2026-05national2100128061.0%12,860
2026-06national2839167158.9%17,420
2026-07national2315121852.6%16,599
2026-08national3202131841.2%17,216
2023-01activist00insufficient025,477,73810
2023-02activist00insufficient024,524,00010
2023-03activist00insufficient025,071,79010
2023-04activist00insufficient026,194,21210
2023-05activist00insufficient025,721,87910
2023-06activist00insufficient027,190,05210
2023-07activist00insufficient029,906,67510
2023-08activist00insufficient029,393,87610
2023-09activist00insufficient027,961,85810
2023-10activist00insufficient028,055,09410
2023-11activist00insufficient026,213,79710
2023-12activist00insufficient072,823,87710
2024-01activist00insufficient070,387,49124
2024-02activist00insufficient067,583,56824
2024-03activist00insufficient074,597,68524
2024-04activist00insufficient077,965,56224
2024-05activist00insufficient082,375,71424
2024-06activist00insufficient093,729,51924
2024-07activist00insufficient098,869,70024
2024-08activist00insufficient0105,066,41724
2024-09activist00insufficient088,440,93324
2024-10activist00insufficient088,836,43324
2024-11activist00insufficient078,617,18324
2024-12activist00insufficient0121,780,09524
2025-01activist00insufficient080,800,18888
2025-02activist00insufficient085,774,00788
2025-03activist00insufficient0101,201,16288
2025-04activist00insufficient0124,613,00988
2025-05activist00insufficient0123,280,05188
2025-06activist00insufficient0140,839,57588
2025-07activist00insufficient0154,657,36688
2025-08activist00insufficient0161,654,40388
2025-09activist23939.1%23158,926,34588
2025-10activist9222.2%11141,764,71688
2025-11activist40insufficient6117,128,85488
2025-12activist10220.0%16155,706,79188
2026-01activist14535.7%17
2026-02activist13215.4%17
2026-03activist24937.5%31
2026-04activist22836.4%27
2026-05activist1051211.4%113
2026-06activist1694929.0%178
2026-07activist2526425.4%287
2026-08activist3324613.9%352

After a verified event, the extra water talk faded with a half-life of about 17.2 months in Texas local forums; about 17.8 months in national forums; about 23.0 months in all sources.

In their words

“These people want total control of us through our water. We are pushing to the brink of a “day zero” disaster”

advocacy group, Fulshear

“I am vehemently opposed to additional AI data centers being built in TX and the United States.”

resident, Missouri City

“Texas is giving data centers more than $1 billion in tax breaks each year. The tax break is one of the state’s costliest incentive programs”

resident, Athens

“My children shouldn’t have to wear ear covers to play outside because the noise decibels from the 24/7 running generators.”

resident, Elm Mott

“So they use massive amounts of water. The same company that was just convicted for knowing harming youth by addicting them to their product is “working towards being more efficient and using less water.” Are you seriously this naive?”

local forum, Austin area

“once it’s done we’ll have a giant eyesore, noise pollution, air pollution, contaminated water, and skyrocketing electricity prices. All for what? Maybe 30-60 permanent jobs?”

local forum, Abilene area

“They do not provide tax revenue. They get an obscene number of tax abatements and incentives and corporations famously dodge taxes anyway.”

local forum, Dallas-Fort Worth area

“In Granbury they built one and it’s so disruptive and loud that it is causing people to have neurological problems and migraines. As someone with Chronic Migraine to a disabling level, that’s a fuuuuuuck no to data centers from me!”

local forum, Dallas-Fort Worth area

“Please help all of us in SE Georgia by signing \this\ petition to stop Project Camellia: the $20B, 3.2 GW Open AI data center planned for Effingham County.”

organized opposition forum

“The AI bubble is going to burst and our farmland and neighborhoods will be left decimated and electricity bills still high”

organized opposition forum

“The data center gets tax breaks, uses millions of gallons of local water, drives up land prices, and brings maybe 30 permanent jobs. The town gets nothing.”

organized opposition forum

“Data centers and AI infrastructure cannot be treated as invisible “cloud” facilities when local people live with the noise, energy demand, land clearing, and environmental impact!”

organized opposition forum

Method note

Sources: public forum posts and comments and written testimony to a Texas House committee, read and sorted one by one; the Texas Water Development Board's county water use reports and its industrial water intake survey. Shares are of the posts from that source, never raw counts. Quotes are verbatim and unedited. Where a group had too few posts to say anything reliable, the tables say so instead of guessing.

this is one run on one population. the same pipeline reads any corpus of human text. read the other stress tests and field notes.

Bring us a population